Pre-Operative Factors May Predict Outcome in Selective Neurectomy for Synkinesis.

Background: While there has been great interest in offering selective neurectomy (SN) to patients with nonflaccid facial palsy (NFFP), postoperative outcomes are inconsistent. Objective: To assess overall SN outcome in NFFP patients and to examine correlation between preoperative factors and SN outcome. Methods: SN cases were retrospectively identified between 2019 and 2021. Patient factors and facial function were assessed using chart review, the Facial Clinimetric Evaluation (FaCE), the electronic clinician-graded facial function tool (eFACE), and an automated computer-aided facial assessment tool (Emotrics). Correlations between preoperative factors and patients outcome were established. Results: Fifty-eight SN cases were performed; 88% were females, and median age was 53 years (range 11-81). Outcome assessment was 8 months on average (1-24 months). Postoperatively, multiple eFACE and Emotrics parameters improved significantly, including ocular, perioral, and synkinesis metrics. In preoperative factors assessment, age >50, facial palsy (FP) duration >2 years, poor preoperative facial function, and nontrauma etiology all correlated with greater improvements compared with younger patients, those with shorter duration facial palsy, trauma etiology, and better preoperative facial function. Conclusions: SN can significantly improve facial function; we have identified several preoperative factors that correlated to outcome.

Does supercharging with cross-face nerve graft enhance smile in non-flaccid facial paralysis patients undergoing selective neurectomy?

BACKGROUND: Cross face nerve grafting (CFNG) is a well-established nerve transfer technique in facial reanimation; however, no study has assessed outcome of supercharging the smile with CFNG in patients with synkinesis. The goal of this study was to examine the smile outcome in non-flaccid facial paralysis (NFFP) patients after supercharging with CFNG during selective neurectomy. METHODS: NFFP patients who underwent CFNG with end-to-side coaptation to a smile branch on the paralyzed side during selective neurectomy were retrospectively identified and their charts were reviewed. Pre-operative and post-operative facial function was assessed with the electronic clinician-graded facial function tool (eFACE), and an automated computer-aided facial assessment tool (Emotrics). Smile metrics were compared pre-operatively, in early post-operative time (EPO, <6 months), and late post-operative time (LPO, >9 months) when CFNG contribution would be expected. RESULTS: Thirteen cases were performed between June 2019 and December 2021. No objective smile metrics improved following supercharging with CFNG. Oral commissure excursion improved by 1.23 points in eFACE (p = .812), and by 0.84 in Emotrtics (p = .187) from EPO to LPO. EFACE dynamic score was improved by 0.08 points from EPO to LPO (p = .969). CONCLUSIONS: Using CFNG for supercharging the smile during selective neurectomy in NFFP patients may not enhance smile. Longer term results following supercharging and long term natural history of selective neurectomy should be assessed.

Understanding the Relationship Between Facial Nerve Branch Sacrifice and Selective Neurectomy Outcome.

Introduction: While there is great interest in selective neurectomy (SN) for patients with synkinesis, outcomes can be inconsistent. Objective: To examine the relationships between intraoperative facial nerve branch transection and both postoperative outcome and functional deficits. Methods: SN cases, with minimal follow-up of 4 months, were retrospectively identified between 2019 and 2021; outcome was assessed using FaCE instrument, eFACE and Emotrics. Correlations between intraoperative facial nerve branch preservation or transection, and functional outcome and new functional deficits were examined. Results: Fifty-six cases were performed: 88% were females, and median age was 53 years (range 11-81). Mean follow-up was 19.5 months (range 4-42). Oral commissure excursion improved in patients where all smile branches were preserved, no vertical vector smile branches were transected, and more than three smile antagonist branches were transected. A linear trend between smile antagonist branch sacrifice and favorable smile outcome was found. Lower lip movement was improved in patients in whom more than half of the identified lower lip branches were transected. Thirty percent of patients experienced untoward postoperative functional deficits, from which 47% recovered with interventions. Conclusions: Several correlations between SN intra-operative decisions and outcome were identified; new or worsening functional deficit rate can be high. However, chemodenervation or fillers can help diminish these deficits.

Favorable Outcome Perception in Facial Selective Neurectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Facial selective neurectomy (SN) improves facial function by denervation of muscles antagonistic to the smile in nonflaccid facial paralysis (NFFP) patients. This study aims to assess whether and which objective facial function metrics affect favorable SN outcome in NFFP patients, as perceived by facial nerve (FN) practitioners. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: NFFP patients who underwent SN at the facial nerve center. METHODS: Standardized preoperative and postoperative facial photographs of patients undergoing SN were analyzed using clinician-graded measures (eFACE) and automated facial measurement (Emotrics). Favorable outcome was ranked subjectively by 3 independent FN practitioners. Correlations between objective metrics and favorable subjective outcome were examined. RESULTS: Fifty-eight SN cases were included. Oral commissure excursion with smile, interlabial distance, and lower lip movement were all considered statistically significantly important for favorable outcome perception. Each +1 mm of smile excursion increases the odds of a favorable outcome by 75.4% (odds ratio [OR]: 1.754). Each +1 mm of interlabial distance asymmetry decreases the odds of a favorable outcome by 24.7% (OR: 0.753). Each +1-point change in lower lip movement eFACE score increases the odds of a favorable outcome by 2.7% (OR: 1.027). CONCLUSION: Several smile metrics contribute to favorable SN outcome perception among FN practitioners. Smile excursion, interlabial distance, and lower lip movement were significant predictors of success. These observations may be extrapolated to other facial reanimation interventions and serve surgeons and patients during counseling and expectation management, and during surgery.

Post Facelift Facial Paralysis: A 20-Year Experience.

INTRODUCTION: Facial nerve (FN) injury during a facelift is a relatively rare but potentially devastating complication. Despite extensive literature discussing facial nerve anatomy and danger zones, few studies describe detailed management, FN exploration intraoperative findings, and outcome following post-facelift facial paralysis (PFFP). We review a 20-year experience in managing iatrogenic PFFP. METHODS: PFFP patients were retrospectively identified between 2002-2022. Demographic data, operative details from the facelift procedure, post-facelift facial function, medical and surgical management, intraoperative findings, and long-term outcome were analyzed. RESULTS: 25 patients who experienced PFFP were referred for evaluation over the past 20 years. Eight patients required FN exploration, of which 6 underwent nerve repair; all recovered to some degree, with 50% achieving essentially normal facial function. 14 patients underwent non-surgical management including physical therapy, chemodenervation and filler therapy. Of these non-surgical patients who were not lost to follow up, 50% achieved normal facial function and 42% achieved near-normal facial function. The single patient who had no spontaneous improvement presented outside the re-innervation window and was not an operative candidate. CONCLUSION: PFFP outcome depends on injury type and location, accurate assessment and appropriate treatment; however, overall prognosis is quite favorable. FN exploration is warranted when nerve transection is suspected. Observation is suitable for patients demonstrating early signs of recovery. Patients presenting beyond a reasonable re-innervation window will be offered other facial reanimation techniques. When FN exploration is required, outcomes may be superior in a facial nerve center setting. Adjunctive interventions for symmetry improvement while awaiting recovery are available.

Lower Facial Nerve Nomenclature Clarification: Cervical Branch Controls Smile-Associated Lower Lip Depression and Dental Display.

OBJECTIVE: In head and neck ablative surgery, traditional teaching is that the key facial nerve branch to preserve along the plane of the lower border of the mandible is the marginal mandibular branch (MMb), which is considered to control all lower lip musculature. The depressor labii inferioris (DLI) is the muscle responsible for pleasing lower lip displacement and lower dental display during natural emotive smiling. STUDY DESIGN: To understand the structure/function relationships of the distal lower facial nerve branches and lower lip musculature. SETTING: In vivo extensive facial nerve dissections under general anesthesia. METHODS: Intraoperative mapping was performed in 60 cases, using branch stimulation and simultaneous movement videography. RESULTS: In nearly all cases, the MMb innervated the depressor anguli oris, lower orbicularis oris, and mentalis muscles. The nerve branches controlling DLI function were identified 2 ± 0.5 cm below the angle of the mandible, originating from a cervical branch, separately and inferior to MMb. In half of the cases, we identified at least 2 independent branches activating the DLI, both within the cervical region. CONCLUSION: An appreciation of this anatomical finding may help prevent lower lip weakness following neck surgery. Avoiding the functional and cosmetic consequences that accompany loss of DLI function would have a significant impact on the burden of potentially preventable sequelae that the head and neck surgical patient frequently carries.

Is nerve coaptation associated with improved sensation after microvascular breast reconstruction? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Sensation after autologous breast reconstruction is an increasingly important outcome. Several studies demonstrated improved sensation with flap neurotization but utilized heterogenous measures and follow-up intervals. This review evaluates sensory outcomes after neurotization using uniform, objective outcome measurements. METHODS: PubMed/Medline and Embase databases were queried for articles published between January 1990 and January 2022. Inclusion criteria included studies with free flap tissue transfer breast reconstruction patients and use of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilaments (SWM) to quantify return of sensation after either neurotization or no neurotization. Reviews, case reports, and studies utilizing implants or pedicled flaps were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 513 articles were screened. Eleven articles met inclusion criteria for a total of 474 patients. There were 254 non-neurotized patients included as controls (Group A) and 220 neurotized patients (Group B). Mean follow-up time was similar in both groups (22.06 months vs. 22.78 months, p > 0.05). There was no significant difference in age (Group A = 49.97 years vs. Group B = 42.47 years) or BMI (Group A = 25.48 vs. Group B = 25.97) between groups. More patients in group B received radiation therapy (Group B = 32.72% vs. Group A = 20.86%, p > 0.05). Patients that received neurotization had lower mean pressure thresholds (Group A = 38.85 gm/mm2 vs. Group B = 6.69 gm/mm2 , p = 0.053) than comorbidity-matched controls. CONCLUSION: Neurotization has been shown to be a safe and feasible option for enhancing return of sensation after breast reconstruction. Future studies with standardized, long-term follow-up will further elucidate the pattern of breast sensation return and the impact of neurotization.

Functionally Addressing Perioral Impairments of the Paralyzed Face.

Management of facial palsy is targeted toward correction of individual patient concerns. Both esthetic perioral changes to the face and functional perioral deficits are commonly concerning to patients with facial paly. Herein, we review perioral impairments resulting from both flaccid and postparalytic facial palsy. Additionally, we discuss targeted therapy and a multitude of technical interventions aimed at restoring perioral functionality to optimize oral competence, speech articulation, and quality of life for facial palsy patients.

Use of the Subfascial Plane for Gender-affirming Breast Augmentation: A Case Series.

Transgender women seeking gender-affirming breast augmentation often present with differences in preoperative chest measurements and contours in comparison with cisgender women. These include a more robust pectoralis muscle and limited glandular tissue, raising important considerations in determining the optimal anatomical plane for implantation. Abundant literature has described advantages and drawbacks of the available planes for breast augmentation in cisgender women. Certain drawbacks may be more pronounced for transgender women, given their distinct anatomy. The subfascial plane offers lower complication rates than the subglandular plane when using smooth implants, and avoids implant animation and displacement associated with the subpectoral plane. To our knowledge, existing studies have not yet addressed this discussion in the transfeminine population. The goal of this article is to highlight potential benefits of the subfascial plane for gender-affirming breast augmentation, utilizing a case series of 3 transfeminine patients, and to review the literature on surgical techniques and outcomes in this population. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients presenting to a single surgeon for gender-affirming breast augmentation in 2019 was performed. A narrative literature review on surgical techniques and outcomes for gender-affirming breast augmentation was conducted. RESULTS: Three cases of gender-affirming breast augmentation using subfascial implant placement are described. From the literature search, 12 articles inclusive of 802 transfeminine patients were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The subfascial plane represents an option for implant placement in gender-affirming breast augmentation that merits further investigation. There is a need for more research comparing surgical techniques and outcomes in the transfeminine population.

Median Nerve Neuropathy following Radial Forearm Free Flap Phalloplasty: A Case Report.

As the transgender population increases, gender-affirming surgeries are being performed at unprecedented rates. Despite this increase, complications and long-term outcomes of gender-affirming interventions are largely understudied. We present a transgender patient who underwent radial forearm free flap (RFFF) phalloplasty as part of gender affirmation. Immediately following surgery, the patient reported paresthesia in the donor arm in the median nerve distribution followed by a neuropathic pain after 1 week. The patient complained of shooting and burning pain and reported a loss of sensation and function at the donor site. Electromyography and magnetic resonance imaging results indicated median nerve damage several inches above the donor site. The symptoms persisted for several months before spontaneously resolving. The spontaneous resolution and location of injury suggest that nerve damage occurred as a result of pneumatic tourniquet application despite adherence to all clinical guidelines for a safe tourniquet application of the same. This is the first reported case of neuropathic pain following RFFF phalloplasty occurring at the donor site. Given the large donor area and the long time of tourniquet application, surgeons offering RFFF phalloplasty must be aware of and actively counsel patients seeking this procedure about the potential for nerve-related damages before surgery.